Found a new local used bookstore this last weekend and, browsing as best as able with the two small kids, I found a 50th Anniversary edition Lord of the Rings copy for a steal at just a few bucks. Turns out it can be had from Amazon for only $11, but I still feel pretty good about myself.
I’ve wanted a single-volume edition for a long time, but I despise books featuring cover art from the movies and refused to buy them. It’s not that I dislike the movies; I actually enjoyed them tremendously, though I was disturbed by several of the creative liberties they took that unacceptably altered elements of the character and story. The problem is that a movie, even a very faithful adaptation, can never truly represent a piece of literature. Unfortunately, after a book has been adapted into a movie it the film becomes much more accessible, much more visible, and eventually becomes the dominant popular culture understanding of the original story. An example of a worst-case scenario is Starship Troopers, which is a great book with a deep, conservative political message tied up in an exciting military science fiction story. The movie adaptation was just plain terrible (in my opinion), carried none of the author’s original meaning or message, and was packed full of gratuitous nudity and gory violence. However that movie now represents Starship Troopers to the vast majority of people and greatly reduces anyone’s desire to read the book since they either “already saw the movie” or thought “the movie didn’t look that good”. I believe this is a real loss.
So on principle, for stories where the book precedes the movie I do not purchase books with movie covers if I can avoid it. The last thing I want is for the movie to so completely dominate the influence of the book that even the book itself has to be plastered with movie imagery to sell. Most of the one volume editions of Lord of the Rings I’ve seen lately, including several copies at the used bookstore, were movie covers. Fortunately they had this 50th Anniversary edition copy there as well with its beautiful watercolor image of Minas Tirith on the cover.
As for the one-volume preference, that one is simply due to the nature of the work; Tolkien always intended it to be one volume divided into 6 parts, and it was his publisher that forced him to break it into three separate books. Breaking up the book into 3 volumes does make practical sense, as the one volume edition is well over 1,000 pages, but I appreciate Tolkien’s original intent enough to go ahead and lug around the one volume edition.
I’ve decided to take the plunge and read the whole thing again, something I haven’t done since college. It’ll probably re-kindle my annoyance with the movies but I also have the movies to thank for some very vivid imagery, much of which is faithful to Tolkien’s original sketches (such as Rivendell), which will certainly enhance reading the book.